 |
| Taylor Lorenz exposed the Libs of TikTok Creator's masks, which led to disputes on Twitter |
Washington Post writer Taylor Lorenz has caused a warm discussion among online entertainment clients after distributing the personality and uncovering the location of a famous moderate individual Twitter account.
Lorenz composed the article on Tuesday, acquainting every last bit of her perusers with the beforehand mysterious lady behind the Libs of TikTok account, which reposted different recordings to make fun of dissidents.
Could TAYLOR LORENZ CONSIDER THIS 'Badgering'?
"Words can't communicate how thankful I am for the help I'm getting at present," she composed on Twitter. "I'm certain we will overcome this and come out considerably more grounded. Thankful for every one of the contemplations and petitions."
Words cannot express how appreciative I am of the support I’m receiving right now. Thankfully I’m currently holed up in a safe location. I’m confident we will get through this and come out even stronger. Grateful for all the thoughts and prayers ❤️
— Libs of Tik Tok (@libsoftiktok) April 19, 2022
Lorenz recently opened up to the world about her doubts against online badgering, getting passionate in a TV section regarding the matter.
"I have severe PTSD as a result of this," Lorenz remarked at the time.
"The land permit for the individual behind the Libs of TikTok account was initially connected to the WaPo piece by Taylor Lorenz, and the connection logged the individual's name, land permission number, and other information." conceivable actual location, and so on," the Washington Examiner's Jerry Dunleavy tweeted. "WaPo just eliminated the connection in the wake of being called out on it."
The WaPo article by Taylor Lorenz originally linked to the real estate license for the person behind the Libs of TikTok account— the link listed the person’s name, real estate license number, possible physical address, etc. WaPo only removed the link after being called out on it.
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) April 19, 2022
Writer Glenn Greenwald called Lorenz a harasser that professed to be tormented.
"What's the new editorial standard being applied?" Greenwald tweeted. "Does it make sense for authors to investigate and unearth the true character of any unknown online entertainment client?" Or on the other hand, is it simply reasonable assuming the mysterious virtual entertainment client has a specific sort of legislative issues?"
What's the new journalistic principle being applied? Is it now permissible for journalists to investigate and expose the real identity of any anonymous social media user? Or is it just permissible if the anonymous social media user has a certain kind of politics?
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 19, 2022
"Taylor Lorenz and the Washington Post are expecting to induce brutality against an individual for the wrongdoing of working a mysterious Twitter account, WaPo and Lorenz realize that Libs of TikToks faces passing dangers from ANTIFA," traditional observer Mike Cernovich composed. "This must be depicted as illegal intimidation."
Taylor Lorenz and the Washington Post are intending to incite violence against a woman for the crime of operating an anonymous twitter account, WaPo and Lorenz know that Libs of TikToks faces death threats from ANTIFA.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) April 19, 2022
This can only be described as terrorism. pic.twitter.com/IHL3RAQflm
"This isn't news coverage," columnist Jack Posobiec composed. "This is doing and spreading of @libsoftiktok by the extremely rich person controlled Bezos Post."
This isn’t journalism. This is doxxing and smearing of @libsoftiktok by the billionaire-controlled Bezos Post https://t.co/uEtuA1Q61H
— Jack Posobiec ☦️ (@JackPosobiec) April 19, 2022
"Taylor Lorenz is an awful columnist and more regrettable human," Ben Shapiro composed.
"Focusing on a Twitter account that simply posts Leftists possessing themselves since that record harms the Left is unadulterated Lorenz."
"Folks, we need to stop extremely rich people like Elon Musk from assuming control over organizations like Twitter since they will not work those organizations like Jeff Bezos does WaPo, which releases Taylor Lorenz on the groups of mysterious Twitter accounts."
Guys, we have to stop billionaires like Elon Musk from taking over companies like Twitter because they won't operate those companies like Jeff Bezos does WaPo, which unleashes Taylor Lorenz on the families of anonymous Twitter accounts.
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 19, 2022
"Taylor Lorenz simply last week was crying about being damaged from individuals on the web reprimanding her," podcaster Matt Walsh composed. "Presently she's doing an unknown record. Lorenz is a normal cry menace slime ball. She merits all the kickback coming in her direction after this. I trust it makes her cry once more."
Taylor Lorenz just last week was crying about being traumatized from people on the internet criticizing her. Now she's doxxing an anonymous account. Lorenz is a typical crybully scumbag. She deserves all the backlash coming her way after this. I hope it makes her cry again. https://t.co/V3QYeHqZwd
— Dr. Matt Walsh, Women’s Studies Scholar (@MattWalshBlog) April 19, 2022
"Wasn't this psycho on television fourteen days prior crying about the specific kind of conduct that is by all accounts her precise plan of action," Donald Trump Jr. composed. "If by some stroke of good luck she attempted to provide details regarding genuine troublemakers instead of irregular characters on friendly… however, we realize that will not occur."
Wasn’t this psycho on tv 2 weeks ago actually crying about the exact type of behavior that seems to be her exact business model. If only she tried to report on real bad actors rather than a random personalities on social… but we know that won’t happen. https://t.co/VBHdCw8Yct
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) April 19, 2022
In the interim, others upheld the general covering the development.
"You will get a ton of reaction on this by individuals whose essential wellspring of delight is disdain watching recordings of crossdressers, however, thank you for composing it," force to be reckoned with Matt Bernstein tweeted.
you will get a lot of backlash on this by people whose primary source of joy is hate watching videos of drag queens, but thank you for writing it.
— matt (@mattxiv) April 19, 2022
"This story underneath is fundamental perusing. Understanding the Right Wing Smear Machine and the perniciousness that drives it is fundamental," columnist Steve Schmidt composed. "The utilization of run-of-the-mill shoe-calfskin news coverage in the quest for realities has given extraordinary offense to [Glenn Greenwald], one of Putin's most helpful imbeciles and unsurprising fixtures of fake tears while conservative unscrupulousness, malignance, and terrorizing is uncovered."
2/ most useful idiots and predictable faucets of crocodile tears when right wing dishonesty, malice and intimidation is exposed. This is a story about how Chaya Raichik became a powerful figure in the Right Wing Extremist Movement by creating a social media mob that harasses
— Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) April 19, 2022
"There's a genuine anecdote about how @libsoftiktok by basically posting recordings turned out to be unbiasedly one of the main moderate activists in the whole country," commentator Saagar Enjeti tweeted. "Taylor Lorenz refuses to be drawn in by the genuine substance/why it reverberates and, all else being equal, resolves to try to eliminate her."
There's a real story about how @libsoftiktok by simply posting videos became objectively one of the most important conservative activists in the entire country
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) April 19, 2022
Taylor Lorenz refuses to engage with the actual content/why it resonates and chooses to try and destroy her instead
Lorenz additionally has a string enumerating her article nailed to her Twitter account as of this report. She even tweeted out the lady's name. There are a predetermined number of clients that are permitted to remark on the string.
Comments
Post a Comment